Search for: "Young v. People" Results 4261 - 4280 of 4,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
  If you are to young (or too old) to remember Bonanza on TV, here is a refresher. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
And I am speaking out of love for those who suffer with gender dysphoria. 60 Minutes, this past Sunday, interviewed over 30 young people who transitioned. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:30 am by Francisco Macías
  Secular courts were involved when the lives of people were at stake. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Chapter 11 of the “Canadian Health Law Practice Manual,” Genetics and the Law, Amy Zarzeczny, Tracey M. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing Same as A 6300 BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
 In July, the Future of Artificial Intelligence Innovation Act of 2024 (S.4178)— introduced in April by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-CA), Todd Young (R-IN), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)—was ordered to be reported out of the Committee and gained three additional co-sponsors: Senators Roger F. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Young people’s engagement with Harry Potter shows how youth learn the skills of democracy by working through the culture around them. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control:  "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Uncertainty makes it v. difficult for nonprofits to provide a robust environment that we all depend on. [read post]