Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 4281 - 4300 of 14,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 10:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The court also bears in mind that the damages cap under Title VII for large employers is $300,000, so that's the ceiling against the State of New York. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
The three that were particularly considered concerned:Corkscrews - El Hogar Perfecto V OHIM (T-337/12);Umbrellas - Senz Technologies BV v OHIM, (T-22/13 and T-23/13); andBiscuits - Biscuits Poult SA v OHIM (T-494/12).We were reminded that the only relevant sense to design law is sight. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit (Judges Henderson, Rogers and Srinivasan) will hear argument in Miller v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:15 am by Amanda Sanders and Catrina Smith (UK)
  However, the Court of Appeal judgment stated that there are numerous cases in which employers have been held vicariously liable for torts committed away from the workplace. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am by Graham Smith
The Bulk Powers Review reveals the extent to which more sophisticated analytical techniques such as anomaly detection and pattern analysis are brought to bear on intercepted material, particul [read post]
  However, the Court of Appeal judgment stated that there are numerous cases in which employers have been held vicariously liable for torts committed away from the workplace. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:59 am by Elizabeth A. Patton
  A case arising from the First Circuit, Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
France, 64016/00, 31 January 2006, Information Note 82) The cases cited at the end also bear reading; note that Otto-Preminger-Institut v. [read post]