Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 4281 - 4300 of 8,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 7:17 am by John Jascob
The court found that the CEO was the "maker" of its statements, but there was insufficient evidence to find liability as to the CFOs (Xu v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:43 am by David DePaolo
Most state systems allow settlement of claims via some full release mechanism.In 2011 reform legislation allowed injured workers 55 and older to enter structured settlements, which the Department of Labor & Industries through its Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals would oversee to make sure that such settlements were adequate.Next year the age limitation decreases to 50.The Washington State FlagEarlier this month the Washington state Court of Appeals ruled in BIIA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Unknown
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, and Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:15 am by John Jascob
Court of International Trade, wrote for a unanimous Eleventh Circuit panel (100079 Canada, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 6:50 am by Mark Astarita
Ernst & YoungSince there are types of notes which, under a traditional Howey analysis, may not be deemed "investment contracts" but still bear a resemblance to a security, the Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:08 am by Keith Mallinson
Rather than speculating about how much aggregate licensing costs could be, costs should be measured by asking licensees what they are actually paying in cash royalties. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:51 pm
 This morning's PatLit carries a good descriptive analysis by Aaron Wood of last week's ruling over the Nexium patent in Astrazeneca v KRKA on what courts do when faced with successful defendant in infringement proceedings who, having been wrongfully tied down by a pre-trial injunction, seeks to cash in on the claimant's cross-undertaking in damages. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:07 pm by Joe Mullin
In recent years, the Supreme Court has limited patent venue abuses, made fee-shifting easier, and most importantly, made it easier to throw out bad software patents in its Alice v. [read post]