Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4281 - 4300 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
” And at ISCOTUSnow, Edward Lee predicts the winners in both Whitfield and yesterday’s other case, B&B Hardware v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:34 am by Ted Max
Enforcement To ensure compliance with the Safe Harbor principles, there must be: (a) readily available and affordable independent recourse mechanisms so that each individual’s complaints and disputes can be investigated and resolved and damages awarded where the applicable law or private sector initiatives so provide; (b) procedures for verifying that the commitments companies make to adhere to the Safe Harbor principles have been implemented; and (c) obligations to… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:32 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In exchange for the kickbacks, Scannell promised to take favorable action on behalf of Krahl as requested and as opportunities arose, including agreeing to help Krahl obtain contracts from Company B, while Scannell was employed at Company B. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Andrew N. Vollmer
Other courts held that a claim under subparts (a) or (c) of Rule 10b-5 could not circumvent Janus and must be based on conduct beyond misrepresentations or omissions actionable under Rule 10b-5(b). [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:29 am
We have posted before about just how difficult Canada is becoming as a jurisdiction for class actions defendants, particularly companies in the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:31 am by PJ Blount
`(c) Exception for Conducting Foreign Intelligence Surveillance- Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, it shall not be unlawful for an officer, employee, or agent of the United States in the normal course of the official duty of the officer, employee, or agent to conduct electronic surveillance, as authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.). [read post]
In considering the criteria, Jackman J noted the Court must take into account the ‘transparency’ of the term, per s 12BG(2)(b), in addition to the contract as a whole, per s 12BG(2)(c), in interpreting unfairness. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:59 pm
That's an inclusive test, meaning that YouTube has to satisfy all three of (A), (B), and (C). [read post]