Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2008, 5:07 pm
  After the Supreme Court decision in Leegin Creative Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
A simple hypothetical drawn from the facts in San Antonio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:47 pm
  After the Supreme Court decision in Leegin Creative Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
"  In other words, they are part of the model judicial ethics code that the ABA has recommended to the states for adoption. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
            Undoubtedly, as the marriage issue dominated public consciousness in the wake of the California ruling, somebody in the state government leaked the Nocenti memo, the newspapers contacted the governor's office to confirm its validity, and the story went public much sooner than planned, leading to charges that the governor was improperly taking some sort of unilateral action in response to the… [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:56 am
A case yesterday decided by the United States District Court of Connecticut highlights that distinction.In Charles v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
Hot off the press and only available at TalkLeft: Peniel Cronin's revised Caucus v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:24 am
Such claims for compensation are fostered by the 1992 decision, Lucas v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:35 pm
What is more interesting about the complaint is the narrative that dominates it. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:37 am
The authority for this ruling is given as the Florida State Constitution, Article V, Section 1 (creating courts, and inherently empowering them) and Article II, Section 3 (separation of powers). [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]