Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 4281 - 4300 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
While in Germany, Gabriela "said to the Competent Agency for Youth Services that she 'was not willing to return w[i]th the child to the United States.' " In an effort to bring about the return of his son to the United States, Keith filed Hague Convention proceedings in Germany through the United States Department of State. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:30 am by Monique Altheim
http://t.co/0vWF04PP # Dropbox Reports User Accounts Were Hijacked, Adds New Security Features http://t.co/wQetUfUW # Prison workers settle lawsuit http://t.co/x5ozIgKO # Data breaches up 19 percent, GAO reports http://t.co/8EHEgUQM # Privacy commissioner ‘deeply disturbed’ by Election Ontario’s handling of voter data http://t.co/F0q5SIer # CSO Magazine Publishes Hogan Lovells Article "Dangerous Assumptions About Clouds" http://t.co/LGWFimug # NBC Is The Real Loser… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 The Ohio jury Instruction cites language from State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:53 am by Victoria VanBuren
 The Convention came into force for the United States one month after the United States deposited its instrument of ratification with the Director-General of UNESCO. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Renée Kolar Since its inception, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has won 58 out of 60 arbitrations against athletes who have contested the agency’s sanctions. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm by DougW
John Larimer, United States Navy cryptologist. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:51 am by Victoria VanBuren
  United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing at §15(b) (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:49 am by Victoria VanBuren
  United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 13 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This has led to substantial variations in the stringency of defamation law or case law, for example different degrees of attributed damages and procedural costs, varying definitions of first publication and the related statute of limitations or the reversal of the burden of proof in some jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]