Search for: "Doe VI" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Robert Chesney
  Does this suffice to de-internationalize the conflict, returning it to non-international armed conflict status? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Zachary Ulrich
” The goal here is to help parties objectively evaluate and value the potential settlement vis-à-vis any biased positions they hold –and hopefully, to guide them to make their own decision about ending their splitting if they are able. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:11 am by Sheppard Mullin
 The interim rule specifies the GAO’s jurisdiction to hear such protests but, noting that Congress didn’t get around to extending the same authority to GAO vis-à-vis task orders issued by civilian agencies, also indicates that GAO has no jurisdiction to do so. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 5:48 am by Ted Frank
However, unlike Title VII of the same Act, Title VI does not contain a national security exception. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:14 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Viñuales, The Resource Curse: A Legal Perspective Giacomo Luciani, Price and Revenue Volatility: What Policy Options and Role for the State? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by The Legal Blog
As regards the oral Agreement to Sell, pleaded by the defendant, the law does not protect the possession of a person who claims to have obtained it under an oral Agreement to Sell in his favour. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:13 pm by The Legal Blog
Article 17(vi) of Schedule II of Court-fees Act provides for payment of a fixed Court fee in a suit where it is not possible to estimate at a money value the subject matter in dispute, and which is not otherwise provided for by this Act.6. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am by Rogers Smith - Guest
This answer does not necessarily resolve all debate over the constitutionality of all or even parts of S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am by Andres
“iv) Whether eBay Europe have infringed the Link Marks by use in sponsored links and on the Site in relation to infringing goods again depends upon a number of questions of interpretation of the Trade Marks Directive upon which guidance from the ECJ is required [...]. v) Whether eBay Europe have a defence under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive is another matter upon which guidance from the ECJ is needed [...]. vi) As a matter of domestic law the court has power to grant an… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Making an A 123(2) assessment dependent on such an external element does not sound right, does it? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:18 am by Roy Ginsburg
Under the new regulations, though, an employee does not have to show that the impairment the employer bases its action upon is an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, only that the employer took the employment action due to its belief regarding the employee’s impairment. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:22 am
Specifically, the Requestor (or "the Hospital") inquires whether the Proposed Agreement satisfies the criteria set forth at 42 C.F.R. 411.357(e)(4)(vi) which states that the "physician practice may not impose on the recruited physician practice restrictions that unreasonably restrict physician's ability to practice medicine in the geographic area served by the hospital. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:45 pm by Jason Mazzone
The text does not obviously answer this question. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by Venkat
It was also interesting that despite using a "reasonable expectation of privacy" standard, the court does not discuss the diminished expectation of privacy for the husband vis a vis his wife . . . who is trying to investigate him for having an affair. [read post]
It should act now by amending Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 so that private individuals can go to court to address the unintentional discriminatory acts which continue to have such a devastating impact on their lives. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:06 pm
[ed: We have no disagreement vis: texting and driving - we both agree that this warrants the immediate application of the death penalty]My take is that talking on the phone using a hands-free device is no more risky than listening (and talking back) to the radio, or to one's spouse in the passenger seat. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:10 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
We have to start our evaluation of the position that Duke authors would be in, vis-à-vis these publishers, by asking ourselves what exactly the Duke Open Access policy is. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In view of this, the Board does not see that a point of law of fundamental importance arises, that would need a clarification by the EBA. [read post]