Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 4281 - 4300 of 27,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
   KNUT IP Management Ltd, on the other had contended an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Part 1 is here.How has the Letter of Recommendation (LOR) system changed in recent years? [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:38 am by Ben
Endemol argued that "Go to Top 101" had similar scenic designs as "1 vs 100" and just like the foreign show, made three "helps" available to contestants. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Zimmer Biomet, No. 1:16-cv-01670, a California federal district court found a public-policy rift between Michigan and California law concerning non-competes. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 2:19 pm
Studies have shown that remaining at least 20 car lengths behind a truck is considered to be a safe distance. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:30 am
That presumes that Governor DeSantis does not issue a line item veto on the amounts recommended in the Budget bill. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:10 pm
One of the earliest symptoms of Parkinson’s may be a loss of smell, which can occur 20-30 years before diagnosis. 2. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:43 am
As Sven Klos remarked, having litigated the same provision of Benelux trade mark law (where the "substantial value" exclusion originates from) for 20 years, he still does not know what it is supposed to mean (and the CJEU's Hauck decision hasn't made this easier, has it). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The lab that identifies the drugs does not provide the item’s overall weight, but a Houston DEA official said that 7.5:1 ratio is consistent with the amount of the two drugs they seize. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:28 am by David J. DePaolo
Time Customer Services, No. 1D12-2398, 1/31/13, published. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands Win to MLBPA and Aaron Judge In… [read post]