Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP)   Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt)     Events… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
Update [2008-8-20 10:4:28 by Big Tent Democrat]: Battleground Poll has McCain by 1, 47-46. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:36 am
    Olympic Questions:   1. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
According to Sanchez, however, Schlatter acted voluntarily as required by Indiana Code 35-41-2-1 when he voluntarily became intoxicated. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:53 pm
The United States Paralympic athletic program, however, does not match those other countries. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:00 am
     I wrote about this issue in "Ethical Ends and Ethical Means," 41 Jour. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:41 pm
  The first would be to ensure that the bill does not touch the legality of circumvention devices themselves. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:41 pm
  The first would be to ensure that the bill does not touch the legality of circumvention devices themselves. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:45 pm
For example, the USA Today Preseason Top 25 Coaches Poll for Division I-A (FBS) (see digg) was published August 1, 2008. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
At pages 39-41, Judge Bates explains why Congress does have a legitimate and important interest in getting to the bottom of what happened to the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or… [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
The Court indicates that, in the United States view, in the absence of a dispute with respect to the meaning and scope of paragraph 153 (9) of the Avena Judgment, Mexico's claim does not fall within the provisions of Article 60 and that the Court lacks "jurisdiction ratione materiae" to entertain Mexico's Application and accordingly lacks "the prima facie jurisdiction required for [read post]