Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:40 am
Jensen: The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in Enka v Chubb On 9 October 2020 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rendered its much-anticipated decision in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Enka v Chubb). [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
THE COURT: You’re good with English? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:20 am
Akpan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The parent company of the group is an English company, based in Windsor. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
While a landmark 2016 Supreme Court decision, Birchfield v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:08 am
Petitioners point to the historical rejection of the English "manner of manufacture" in favor of the broader Constitutional "and useful Arts" as support for protection of processes being a seminal Constitutional right. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
On November 9, 2009, Safety Nat’l Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
” But he cited the Court’s most recent ruling in this area, Doe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:56 pm
In R. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:20 am
In Water Splash v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:37 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
It is a tried and true metaphor, like its modern English counterpart -- between a rock and a hard place. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
