Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2013, 7:22 pm
[More] Consumption v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 2:00 am
See generally State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:35 pm
., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:27 am
In Cosmotrade SA v Kairos Shipping Ltd and others [2013] EWHC 1904 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the question of whether English law allows a Limitation Fund to be constituted by way of a P&I Club Letter of Undertaking. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Langfan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Italy): On Right Outcomes and Wrong Terms Marco Calisto, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State: Germany v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:44 am
The case, Hannah v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:24 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
In Corporate Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
from: www.fromrussia.com Where licensee had licensed “Russian language only” or “English language only” rights to distribute Russian language films in the United States, could the licensor claim copyright infringements over production of DVDs with multilingual functionality? [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 6:59 pm
The papers will be published in English, French or Spanish in one volume by Editions Bruylant/Larcier. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The criminal laws stood on the states’ books well into the Twentieth Century, with the Supreme Court in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
John adds that Mr Brandis has stated that the new Government will wait until the post-implementation review of the ARR scheme is complete before it does anything. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
I have been sitting on the latest decision in International Custom Products v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:13 am
In Estate of Juan Benitez v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Professor Lund disputed this, noting that the “pre-existing right” protected by the Second Amendment was the right as it existed in the United States under the common law and state constitutions, not the right as it existed under English law. [read post]
