Search for: "Generics International (US), Inc." Results 4281 - 4300 of 9,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This post examines an opinion the California Court of Appeals for the Second District recently issued in a civil case:  American International Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:11 pm
She is currently Secretary General of Transparency International Norway. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
LEXIS 4073, *12 (internal record citations omitted). [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
  For example, the OCR reached a settlement with QCA Health Plan, Inc. involving a stolen laptop with unencrypted PHI of only 148 people. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:35 am by Frances Rogers
The Court of Appeals erroneously relied upon its earlier decision in the case of International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
In the context of work restrictions, a repetitive use limitation is generally compensable when the worker is limited to “frequent” repetitive use or action. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
In this post, London-based barrister Ashley Roughton provides a more detailed review of that book.* JUST OUT - Molecular weights at the Supreme Court - Teva v SandozThe IPKat has already covered the UK litigation of Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda/Teva, in which a patent that covered glatiramer acetate was held valid even though the claims specified a particular molecular weight range without specifying what method was used to measure that weight (here, here,… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> ". . .no challenge -- no challenge -- poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change. . . [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
It’s the most thorough discussion I have found, and it gives us enough context to evaluate the proposed amendment sentence-by-sentence. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" "Date of loss" is not defined in the general definition section of the policy. [read post]