Search for: "Generics International (US) Inc" Results 4281 - 4300 of 9,126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> ". . .no challenge -- no challenge -- poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change. . . [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
It’s the most thorough discussion I have found, and it gives us enough context to evaluate the proposed amendment sentence-by-sentence. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" "Date of loss" is not defined in the general definition section of the policy. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Liveperson, Inc. v. 24/7 Customer, Inc., 2015 WL 170348, No. 14 Civ. 1559 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986).Halo Electronics, at *8.Section 271(a) of the patent statute provides in relevant part that “whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States . . . infringes the patent. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
And only a few days later (October 4th), King filed a lawsuit against 20th Century Fox Record Corporation and Mister Maestro, Inc. for selling records of the speech without King’s consent.1 The District Court granted a preliminary injunction in December after concluding, “There are thus no principles which prevent relief to plaintiff from what seems the unfair and unjust use by defendants of his speech and his voice. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
As a general rule, the granting of a one-off patent is usually not a market-moving event. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
Three years after Steele joined Platinum, the company was sold to SRA International, Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1243 http://t.co/SxCrxjq2we -> Letter of Request in patent case enforced in Arctic Cat Inc. et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 6:20 am by Ben
Solicitor General to submit a brief in the case, a common practice when the justices seek the federal government’s legal views in cases with national implications. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 9:01 am by Allison Tussey
This case was investigated by the FBI and the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]