Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 4281 - 4300 of 104,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Curtis Dodd
A recent decision out of the Eastern District of Texas granted the plaintiff patent owner summary judgment with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim that the plaintiff breached licensing related obligations owed to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) by not communicating with the defendants prior to suing for infringement.... [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Curtis Dodd
A recent decision out of the Eastern District of Texas granted the plaintiff patent owner summary judgment with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim that the plaintiff breached licensing related obligations owed to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) by not communicating with the defendants prior to suing for infringement.... [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From the EEOC's press release yesterday (and you can also read the Complaint, in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
Supreme Court has struck down cost considerations, such as Whitman v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Earlier, an ex parte PI order was granted by the UPC Local Division Dusseldorf in June 2023 (ORD_ 541204/2023, in the case of myStromer AG v Revolt Zycling AG), The order in the 10x Genomics case was issued yesterday by Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann at the Munich local division of the UPC. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Earlier, an ex parte PI order was granted by the UPC Local Division Dusseldorf in June 2023 (ORD_ 541204/2023, in the case of myStromer AG v Revolt Zycling AG), The order in the 10x Genomics case was issued yesterday by Presiding Judge Matthias Zigann at the Munich local division of the UPC. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
And finally, in the most recent C-204/21 Commission v Poland, the Court asserted its authority in the strongest possible terms by proclaiming that, “the review of Member States’ compliance with the requirements arising from Article 2[…] TEU falls fully within the jurisdiction of the Court” (para. 62), and that Article 2 TEU is not merely a statement of policy guidelines or intentions, but rather “contains values which are an integral part of the very… [read post]