Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 4281 - 4300 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court today declined to take up the case of Cash v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm by Viking
  As a result, our superior court  vacated our decision and remanded  the case to this Court  for  further review. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
The federal district court approving the settlement did not err in granting certification of nationwide settlement classes consisting of direct purchasers of gem diamonds and indirect purchasers of rough or cut-and-polished diamonds (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,304), the appellate court held.Class CertificationThe proposed classes satisfied each of the four requirements enunciated in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) as prerequisites to certification—numerosity,… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Steven G. Pearl
For claims arising before October 1, 2000, the trial court granted the motion for summary adjudication on grounds that the Bell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Berkeley (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1329: Development standards waived under density bonus laws were not applicable to a density bonus project because Government Code section 65915 requires a local agency grant waivers or reductions of development standards that “will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development meeting the criteria” of the density bonus statute, and the City’s code requires the City to grant density bonuses upon… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:31 am by Chris Jaglowitz
Webb, 2011 ONSC 2365 In what is probably only the fifth case of its kind, the Ontario Superior Court granted the extraordinary remedy of forcing a unit owner to sell and vacate a condo unit. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 1:35 pm by AALRR
  Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]