Search for: "Heard v. State"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 17,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
EM (Eritrea) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 6 – 7 November 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
EM (Eritrea) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 6 – 7 November 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
As stated by the SJC in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am
How likely it is that such a case is heard by Judge Kuehnen is hard to say. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:06 pm
They say that the state's indemnifying these prison officials, as well as creating the underlying problem, and since both of these acts are entirely voluntary (as indeed they are), the state can hardly be heard to complain. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
The (actual) Supreme Court heard arguments in Trinity Lutheran were on April 19 and is set to release its opinion on Monday, June 26.NEW YORKWHEN a spirited and expanded 16-justice Supreme Court considered Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:03 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 11:11 pm
"The case, Baze v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:59 am
This was addressed in a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm
In late August 2013, the Tax Court heard a case involving this very issue is Hellman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
” Al-Harbi v. [read post]
