Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C" Results 4281 - 4300 of 9,979
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2016, 2:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: Following the NLRB’s expansion of the definition of “joint employer” in the high-profile Browning-Ferris case and the employer’s subsequent appeal to the D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:55 am by Legal Profession Prof
On September 12, I reported that the case that promises to take longer to resolve than any matter in D.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:58 am by Quinta Jurecic
  Papers may concern any matter related to national security law. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
They don’t want to drop their pants, no matter how good it might be for the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic
For the defense, Jestin explains that the Khan’s team is withdrawing the plea because, under the D.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Eric Baxter is Senior Counsel at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Washington, D.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:39 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The contract, worth $8.86 million, is the first FAFAA contract for the company run by former Treasury official Jim Millstein, who has advised the García Padilla administration on fiscal and restructuring matters during the recent financial crisis facing the island. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:29 am
Washington, D.C.: Howard University Press, 1916.Locke, Alain (Charles Molesworth, ed.) [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
 As a matter of law, the HQE must have at least a thirty-day break in service between any federal or uniformed service and appointment as an HQE. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:25 am by Farrah Nagrampa
The original document is held at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:31 am by Lee E. Berlik
What matters, the court held, is what the language of the contract actually says, not what the employer or its employees assume it to mean. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:31 am by Lee E. Berlik
What matters, the court held, is what the language of the contract actually says, not what the employer or its employees assume it to mean. [read post]