Search for: "In re Davis" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
1 Crown Office Row’s Peter Skelton appeared for The Security Services in this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
There are ever more stories in the news these days involving professors at public universities who seem to claim that university diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies and programs are trampling the professors’ free speech rights. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:03 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
(in support of petitioner) Docket: 08-1443 Title: In re Troy Davis Issue: After the capital defendant has exhausted relief from any other court and seven of nine State witnesses have recanted their trial testimony, should the Court grant “original” habeas and transfer the case to a federal District Court to hold an evidentiary hearing? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:16 pm by tekEditor
Trumping them all was a 2009 article in Scientific American by Mark Jacobson, a professor of civil engineering at Stanford University, and Mark Delucchi, a researcher in transportation studies at the University of California, Davis. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 3:52 pm by Edward Smith
Equal Pay For Farmworkers Equal Pay For Farmworkers I’m Ed Smith, a Stockton Farming Accident Attorney. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
Editor's note: This post was originally published at 7:34 p.m. on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 As the gavel comes down on the 113th Congress (which spanned January 2013 to December 2014), and the new 114th Congress begins its work today, it’s a good time to take stock of what was achieved and what lies ahead for animals in the New Year. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm by Michael Markarian
As the gavel comes down on the 113th Congress (which spanned January 2013 to December 2014) and the new 114th Congress begins its work today, it’s a good time to take stock of what was achieved and what lies ahead for animals in the New Year. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
  This common-sense notion, that a warning that’s not read cannot be causal, has been bedrock law in prescription medical product liability litigation for decades: Alabama In re Trasylol Products Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 2117257, at *5 (S.D.Fla. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Individuals generally receive such coverage in one of four ways:  (i) through Medicaid, if they’re eligible; (ii) through Medicare, if they’re eligible; (iii) through an employer-provided insurance plan, if their employer offers one; or (iv) on the government “exchange,” if the individual is not covered in one of the other three ways. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:52 am
The simplistic binaries that frame conversations of Palestinian armed struggle evoke the condescension expressed by colonial overloads toward the resistance of indigenous peoples. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
On September 15, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court will sit in Houston, TX (University of Houston Law Center) to hear oral argument on whether a payday lender may divert a class action filed against it over its practice of pursuing the collection of defaulted civil debts through criminal prosecution with bad-debt affidavits in violation of Texas law. [read post]