Search for: "Jones v. State"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 6,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
While a court may possess the discretion to permit such an examination under appropriate circumstances, the defendant failed to demonstrate that such circumstances were present here akin to the cases of People v Earel and Peole v Jones. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm
Jones, In re C.S., In re Hezzie R., Ryan D.L. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Interestingly, both filed by Michael Heim’s firm with Miranda Jones on both briefs representing plaintiff-petitioners. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:04 pm
” Stover, 549 F. 3d at 997–98 (quoting Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:36 pm
Michael Carvin from Jones Day argued for the Petitioners. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
By Daniel Stanton As we recently reported, the Fifth Circuit decided the case of Meche v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The majority expressed some doubt about whether that tire chalking is actually a search under the physical trespass theory of United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
In Kohler Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
In doing so, it read dictum in Jones v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:59 am
Castillo has posted Immigration Consequences: A Primer for Texas Criminal Defense Attorneys in Light of Padilla v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
Jones denied the International Franchise Association’s (IFA) motion for preliminary injunction in the IFA v. [read post]
MAKING THE RELEASE OF THE DEPENDENCY EXEMPTION CONDITIONED UPON THE RECEIPT OF THE CHILD SUPPORT DUE
9 Jun 2015, 9:19 am
Judge Jones noted: First, even though the parties’ settlement agreement does not expressly state same, the court finds that there is logically an implicit relationship between the child dependency exemption and the parental child support obligation. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
This decision effectively overrules recent United States Court of Appeals jurisprudence, such as Guevara v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
The other element in U.S v. [read post]
