Search for: "Kat"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 6,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 1:00 am
This Kat was recently made aware that there will soon be another referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) on Article 3(c) of the Regulation concerning the supplementary protection certificate (‘SPC Regulation’). [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
Kat friend Anna Toh brings us a recent example of this as it played out before the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:39 am
For more information and to sign up click here.Fancy contributing to the Kat. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:26 am
Kat friend Tyrone Berger reports on a recent case in Australia that addresses the ever-vexing quetion of when use amounts to trade mark use.In the recent decision of Pinnacle Runway Pty Ltd v Triangl Ltd, the Australian Federal Court has found that the name given to a style of bikini will not amount to 'use as a trademark' so as to consitute trade mark use. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 1:05 am
Kat friend Chia Ling Koh describes a recent case, Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat and anor [2020] SGCA 103, a decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:18 am
On Friday of last week, this Kat posted a report on, and some thoughts in relation to, the event on Thursday evening concerning Clause 13 of the Intellectual Property Bill. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:06 am
Second, there were arrangements by which a prospective student’s college admission test scores would be illegally secured.OK Kat, but what does this have to do with IP? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
Kat Friend Paul McClelland shared with the IPKat audience his reflections on the role of expert testimony in a cybersquatting case in Singapore. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:07 am
Kat reader Lisa Moser provides an overview for the IPKat on this decision. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Such a risk must be assessed globally, considering all relevant circumstances at hand, including the similarity between the signs and goods/services.Clearly Federico Gatti is The IPKat's favourite Juventus footballer ("Gatti" means "Kats" in Italian)Turning to the merits of the application, the court found that the defendant company had used Juventus' trade marks in commerce and had done so without due cause. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:05 am
Emerging from the busyness of hearing preparation, this Kat has now found a moment to tell you about a clever little loophole just closed by OHIM (the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market) which previously made it possible to defeat (in part at least) an attempt to revoke a Community trade mark (CTM) despite it never having been used.For those who don't get the tenuous reference in the title, scroll downUnder European trade mark law, you either use it or you lose it – once… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as imposing a requirement that an application for registration of a trade mark with respect to a service which consists in bringing together services must be formulated with sufficient clarity and precision so as to allow the competent authorities and other economic operators to know which services the applicant intends to bring together.It seems to this Kat that if the words "other economic operators", referred to in the ruling, mean… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:34 am
In the end the Court of Appeals rejected all of the arguments, not allowing for the protection of yoga poses through copyright.The case was a straightforward application of the law, but this Kat enjoyed the mental exercise in its use for something more unconventional. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 3:45 pm
There is significant on-going work on these issues currently undertaken by the Commission (see recent Kat posts here) to ensure that copyright is fulfilling its function in the new economy and is continuing to provide a mechanism to finance culture. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Art & Artifice carries a report on the event here, but the Kats have their own version, kindly penned by Rouse's Mary Smillie. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:33 am
"A few months ago, this Kat discovered from her favourite and very reliable source of legal information, ie Vogue, that this decision had been appealed. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
This Kat understands that this is the position already adopted by many European jurisdictions (but should he be mistaken, corrective comments by readers are welcome). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:15 am
Comments This Kat is not surprised by the ruling of the Hague District Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:37 am
As this Kat reported in At last, the sun rises: China will establish the National IP Appeals Court in 2019 and 50 days: Chinese SPC IP Tribunal closes its first case, since 1 January 2019, China has had an IP Tribunal within the Supreme People’s Court (‘the SPC’), serving as the national IP appeals court. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:56 pm
Hoping that that has piqued your interest, the IPKat has relied upon Freshfield's trainee Janhvi Chandha generously loaned out by IPKat friend and master of all AIPPI events in the UK, Justin Watts, for a report of the evening for the Kat's readers: "At AIPPI UK’s event on the Jackson reforms last night, hosted by Freshfields, Mr Justice Arnold discussed the IP recommendations of the Jackson Report. [read post]
