Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 4281 - 4300 of 21,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 7:48 pm
  In AFFIRMING the lower court's order which had granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, the Appellate Division, First Department held: The algae did not constitute an unreasonably dangerous condition for which the defendant may be held liable, as it was inherent in the nature of a lake in the summer (see Stanton v Town of Oyster Bay, 2 AD3d 835 [2003], lv denied 3 NY3d 604 [2004]; Nardi v Crowley Mar. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm
Are the defendants liable for legal malpractice and breach of contract? [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:54 am by Marcel Pemsel
As such, the defendant is not liable for injunctive relief, damages or other remedies for trade mark or company name infringement. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:46 am by emagraken
Yeager Properties Inc.) the Plaintiff injured herself at the Defendants bakery. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:30 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of September 5, 2023 from Wise Law on Twitter:Trump Trial Set for March 4 in Federal Election Case Art generated by AI can’t be copyrighted, DC court saysTop state court will hear condo board dispute over emotional support dogAdvocates slam Ford government's revisions to Ontario strip search laws, demand immediate reformTakeaways from a busy and significant day in the Donald Trump criminal cases'Parents must be fully… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 am
In so holding, the Seventh Circuit rejected the carrier’s argument that the lawyer it hired to defend the suit was solely at fault for failing to notify the insured of the danger of an excess judgment. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:43 am by Jonathan Lim, Resource Law LLC
In the recent case of The “STI Orchard” [2022] SGHCR 6 where the plaintiff bank (“Plaintiff”) sought summary judgment against the defendant shipowner (“Defendant”), the General Division of the High Court of Singapore granted the Defendant unconditional leave to defend the Plaintiff’s claim for misdelivery. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:56 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
See More Posts: Plaintiff’s Expert’s Conclusions Protected by Work Product Doctrine, Illinois Injury Lawyer Blog, November 23, 2016. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
The defendants dispute the existence of any such "legal principle" exists under the French law. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 7:14 am by Charles Kotuby
§ 1606) provides that in any case where the foreign sovereign defendant is not immune from jurisdiction, “the foreign state shall be liable in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
Be Prepared and Aware With a Criminal Defense Attorney The farthest thing from your mind is that at some point your child may really need to be defended for an alleged crime in a court of law. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by patrickdaniellaw
Bars and other establishments can be held liable for personal injury or wrongful death in a dram shop claim. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
The error that resulted in defendant's convictions was one of law, rather than one of fact. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by John Day
 The trial judge permitted the witness to testify, and the defendant challenged that ruling on appeal after a jury found it liable for Lapsley's injuries. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Steinert and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Defendants, 016919/08 we see the application of this principal. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 1:37 pm
After probation has been terminated, the probationer is released from the probation and is not liable for the offense for which probation was allowed. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
’” The Court reasoned: [W]e agree with the trial court’s finding that Defendant retained immunity under the civil rights exception in § 29-20-205(2). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:25 am by Gene Quinn
Feb. 5, 2010) (“SEB”) addresses a defendants liability for inducement as well as for direct infringement. [read post]