Search for: "MOORE v. MOORE" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 12:33 pm by Eric Lipman
Apparently, the citations that should link to the Supreme Court's decision in Virginia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:55 am by David Oscar Markus
Miami's own Robert Glazier will be arguing Krupski v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(IAM)   Australia FCA decision enforces trade marks over internet marketing of strata-titled property: Mantra Group Pty Ltd v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm by Matthew Nelson
The Court also remanded People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In light of the importance of the witnesses' credibility in this case, as noted above, we cannot conclude that the court's error is harmless (see generally Crimmins, 36 NY2d at 241-242; People v Moore, 59 AD3d 809, 811-813). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 pm
Ironically, that rule comes, in part, from the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in the case of People v Cress (yet another Battle Creek area murder case). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Employer seeks to terminate employee following her return to work after six month absence without explanationNYC Dept. of Sanitation v Moore, OATH Index 1035/10The New York City Department of Sanitation sought to terminate Sabrina Moore, a clerical associate, who had been absent without leave for more than six months. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]