Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 4281 - 4300 of 21,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegalNever Too Late 263 [Week ending May 3] The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the Gömböc judgment | The non-systematic relevance of earlier IP rights: from Gömböc to Brompton Bicycle | Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt's favour) | SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement | Is COVID-19 a Nietzschean moment for… [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
After almost three weeks with almost no activity, the criminal case involving the United States v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald suggests that “[a] reasonable compromise” in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 666 [1st Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].) [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:41 am by SHG
But for Mark Shaffer, it’s a cause of action. [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
  The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am by Ralf Michaels
Victoria Lee, Mark Lehberg, Vinny Sanchez and James Vickery go beyond force majeure implications on contracts in their expert analysis. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
DFP met SDCC’s claim for infringement with an affirmative defense that SDCC’s marks were “generic ab initio. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:46 am by Angela Mauroni
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday in Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:56 am by Mark Movsesian
My essay addresses some of the legal issues: whether bans are "generally applicable" under Employment Division v Smith, how courts might weigh the burden on religion against the state's interest in curbing the epidemic, whether less-restrictive means are available, etc. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am by INFORRM
This week was marked be partial re-openings across all states, more details of which can be found on the CNN website. [read post]