Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 4,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
And while the Court in Romer needed to infer animus from the circumstances, that anti-religious animus that motivated Blaine Amendments is a matter of well-developed historical record. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Times, the Wall Street Journal, and NPR also have coverage, and at the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro highlights Justice Kennedy's point that "the Court has never found a law restricting speech to be constitutionally acceptable just because prosecutors have so far used restraint. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:27 pm
Ed Poll: I don’t see blogs going away, no matter how hard the bar associations seek to regulate it. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
The Court has reaffirmed constitutional protections for dignity in Lawrence (in which Justice Anthony Kennedy quotes Casey explicitly), and more recently in Windsor and Obergefell. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:22 am
http://tinyurl.com/4ywzkug (Jon Resnick) Does your Workflow for Litigation Matters make Financial, Legal and Operational Sense? [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
However, since the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy in 2018, every Republican appointee on the Court has been substantially more conservative than every Democratic appointee. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
If competition generated by a public plan could reduce these costs, then, as a matter of a longterm investment in society, a public plan seems like a valid and sensible policy.If Congress creates a new public plan, insurers will have to lower their own costs, face reduced profits and adjust like every other sector in this changing economy. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
The trial in this matter will not now be taking place on 5 November 2018. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
As we know and as Luis Fuentes-Rowher has written in his articles, much of this will likely turn on Justice Kennedy’s view of the continued constitutionality of Section 5. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:27 am
It is, of course, possible that the copper mine would be found to serve a compelling governmental purpose—but RFRA was intended to put the government to the test on matters such as these. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
“The heart of the problem,” Alito said, is rather that computers have made it possible to intrude very far into private matters, so the privacy that people used to be able to count upon because the government did not have the resources to monitor the people so closely was now more threatened. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
The individual truth won't matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
” Only three other justices (Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan) joined this footnote. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:51 am
As Justice Anthony Kennedy noted at oral argument, three employees could “go to the same attorney and say please represent us, and we will share our information with you, we have three individual arbitrations. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm
Whatever else I may disagree with him about, Duncan Kennedy is right about one thing: the reproduction of hierarchy is where it's at, for both conservatives and progressives, and especially the most well-credentialed and ambitious ones. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
So no, I mean, there are situations where the court obviously has to resolve, as a legal matter, issues that are of great political significance. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:00 am
Kennedy’s campaign alleges Biden, Trump, and CNN “colluded” to leave Kennedy off the debate stage. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Democratic Group Plans $10 Million Push to Protect Election Officials DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 8/17/2023 A group that works to elect Democrats as the top election officials in states around the country is planning a $10 million venture to pay for private security for election officials of both parties, register new voters, and try to combat disinformation. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
Justice French agreed with that, and wrote a separate concurrence, joined by Justices Kennedy and DeWine, addressing (and rejecting) the single subject constitutional challenge. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
