Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:35 pm
The Court of Appeals has already approved retroactive increases in the term of registration in the case of Young v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 am by Liz Campbell
Moreover, denying a solicitor access to the notes of his client’s interrogation does not render detention unlawful (Lavery v Member in Charge, Carrickmacross Garda Station [1999] 2 IR 390). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:07 pm by Fazal Khan
My response was that of course, people with ill-intent could interpret some epigenetic research findings as a “rational basis” to discriminate against groups or individuals that have a certain epigenetic profile. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:07 am by The Legal Blog
Ganoo of the Bombay High Court [ in Sabah Adnan Sami Khan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:02 am by SHG
When a decision is rendered by a majority of one, it means that four of these theoretically brilliant people have decided against the holding. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:45 pm by joao_lima
As Roy Tennant says, “Librarians like to search; everyone else likes to find,” and further adds: “People generally want to find everything they can on a topic, ranked by relevance and displayed in ways that make it easy to narrow in on their goal. [read post]