Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 4281 - 4300 of 178,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 8:16 am
Plaintiffs argue, among other things, that the opinion "errs in holding that a de novo standard of review applies to the trial court's determination of similarity of conduct," and that the Court of Appeal's "legal standards for determining whether conduct is 'similar' are too narrow. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In an action to recover damages for alleged civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC §1983, Plaintiff appealed Supreme Court's granting the Town's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff's complaint. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
The plaintiff no longer had to rely on the general credit of the defendant or defendant's insurer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:03 am by Legal Profession
The hearing court found that plaintiff's disobedience of the so-ordered stipulation directing... [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:42 pm by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
At the personal injury trial, the parties stipulated as to the amount of the plaintiffs medical expenses. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In this matter, the court found that a Plaintiff could not sue his employer for allegedly failing to investigate a dog bite that occurred at the place of employment and thereby obstructing the Plaintiffs ability to bring a claim against the customer who owned the dog. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 11:21 am by Javier Dominguez
“The quality of the counsel on the defense side was of equal caliber to the quality of council on the plaintiffs side,” Hanzman told Law.com last June. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:10 am by Francis Pileggi
The NRA News TV Channel recently interviewed the plaintiff, who until the final decision was published, remained anonymous for fear of retaliation. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
It’s possible that a violation of FCRA’s procedural requirements results in no harm. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:09 pm by emagraken
 The defendant will be restricted to analyzing and respond to the plaintiffs report. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:29 am by ccladm
However, the trial court disregarded the affidavit of the plaintiffs expert witness, and granted defendant’s summary judgment. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:29 am by ccladm
However, the trial court disregarded the affidavit of the plaintiffs expert witness, and granted defendant’s summary judgment. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 At a hearing on October 9, 2012, the District Court denied Plaintiffs Motion for a temporary restraining order. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, these statutes do not provide a cause of action for the parent of the alleged abused child’s injuries. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s company was also liable for the actions of their doctor. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
Demolition of plaintiff's uninhabited and collapsing building was a seizure under the Fourth Amendment, but it was reasonable on a balancing of interests. [read post]