Search for: "STATE V. LEE" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm by Daniel Low
News America had filed motions with the Court seeking to exclude certain evidence, including, for example, references to the state court verdict against News America, an internal Valassis memo – dubbed the "Valassis Dolphin Project Memo" – analyzing the reasons for News America's aggressive tactics, and a statement made a representative of Sara Lee who stated that it "[f]eels like they [News America] are raping us and they enjoy it. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
The Administration is committed to promoting nuclear power in the United States and developing a safe, long-term solution for the management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:54 am by Jeff Gamso
Last week we learned that Judge Berchelmann doesn't think there should be any sanction imposed on Sharon Keller.Yesterday, we saw that the Supreme Court declined its own invitation to overrule (or at least weaken) Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:03 am by Steve Hall
  More on the Supreme Court's 2008 lethal injection ruling, Baze v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm by Terry Lenamon
Faced with the problem of how to provide legal counsel to those who cannot afford to hire their own attorney after Gideon v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:24 pm by Don Cruse
Janice Lee and Bob Lee, No. 09-0313 (docket and briefs) In this case, a horse owner took a friend on a trail ride. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 5:57 pm
  The SSRN abstract states: Last term, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Dr. Mark Lee Levine
If the taxpayer anticipates “selling’ a property to complete the exchange, the taxpayer must acquire a property that is otherwise qualified and within Code §1031, as stated, above. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:22 pm by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  After a detailed exposition of Michigan standing doctrine, the Court concluded that the county road commissions and the public works entities had failed to satisfy their burden of proving the necessary elements of standing, adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in from federal standing doctrine in Lee v. [read post]