Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2008, 4:56 pm
S___ K___ v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:34 am
DNA samples; offenders Last Act: 05/12/08 amend (t) and recommit to codes05/12/08 print number 9974aA9975A
Bradley -- Req [read post]
17 May 2008, 3:10 pm
The distinct question of "Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is 'testimonial' evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Although urinalysis results may often be sufficiently reliable evidence that the opportunity for crossexamination is unnecessary for due process purposes, see United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:04 pm
The state argues that the "grossly repugnant" video games are not worthy of First Amendment protection because they do not communicate or express ideas or information.For more information, please see: Entertainment Software Association et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:38 am
And Estrada v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:00 am
Antelope Valley Press v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:18 pm
""Put another way, a prosecutor errs when he 'presents statistical evidence to suggest that the (DNA) evidence indicates the likelihood of the defendant's guilt rather than the odds of the evidence having been found in a randomly selected sample," the court said. [read post]
6 May 2008, 10:19 am
The episode aired just six days after the real court heard arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:12 am
Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:50 am
Sample: Wal-Mart Reacts to Advance By-Law Cases In the wake of the two recent Delaware Chancery Court cases (Levitt Corp. v Office Depot; JANA Partners v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:00 am
It’s not often that a Texas tax collection case achieves the status of a published decision by one of the State’s appellate courts, but that’s exactly what happened in Noorani Gas & Convenience, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 11:24 pm
Some agencies require informed consent to get DNA, but it's legal to lie to get DNA samples, DNA in someone's trashcan is fair game, and you don't need probable cause to take a DNA sample under current law, the gathering was told in a seminar titled DNA 101.The legal eagles among you may be interested that the Supreme Court recently granted cert (meaning they agreed to hear the case) in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:01 pm
Sirkin is a Board Certified Specialist attorney in Estate Planning, Probate and Trust Law by the Board of Legal Specialization of the State Bar of California. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:43 am
At the hearing, the prosecutor must produce a calculation of the acceptable range of the breath samples as outlined in Worksheet “A” of the State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:27 am
There's progress on the death penalty front to report: VA Governor Tim Kaine has imposed a moratorium on executions until the Supreme Court decides Baze v. [read post]
