Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 21,135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
Sales of units in multi-unit projects needed to raise funds for completion may cease. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:57 am
So I was interested to read that the Michigan Supreme Court will soon consider an appeal in Residential Funding Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
The tax scheme in question was an effort to tax online sales in the state based on the idea that sales affiliates in the state constituted a “presence” for sales tax purposes. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:32 am
V. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
(see Robin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Insureds still have the right in the Fifth Circuit to bring suit on extra-contractual claims under state law against a flood insurer, according to the 1993 opinion, Spence v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:38 am
A former sales director who filed suit under state law for vacation time he had accrued before his discharge raised a material issue of fact as to whether he was owed that accrued pay, a federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 2:09 pm
The Howey test, named after the case in which the test was first applied, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
Supermarket Equipment Sales, LLC, 290 Ga. 462, 722 S.E.2d 55 (Feb. 6, 2012). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Ace Motor Sales, 550 F. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 12:31 pm
Supreme Court’s unanimous decision this week in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
I do think that Hershey has stated a pretty good case for a parody but that is not quite what they wanted to do here. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
In Wells Fargo Bank v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:47 am
MCL § 600.2961(8) states that “[a] provision in a contract between a principal and a sales representative purporting to waive any right under this section is void. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
He argues the evidence supports a conclusion he intended to commit, if anything, theft by false pretenses by disguising the laptop computers in the printer box, paying the stated price for the printer at the sales counter, and, contrary to the theory of larceny, `tak[ing] the laptops from the store with consent. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW, TAX LAW US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
In a huge win for consumers in New Jersey and throughout the United States, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided today in the case of Real v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
An investigation of the mis-selling found that Sureterm had unfairly increased the price between quotation and sale in 28,775 instances of a total of 81,002 sales. [read post]
