Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds, Staff Report the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (September 2003). [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am by Laurie Williams - Guest
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has authority to prevent “the introduction of plant pests into the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm by Susan C. Morse
Instead, the majority looked to the interpretation of “a similarly worded criminal statute” in a 1995 obstruction-of-justice case, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: At Burnham & Gorokhov’s Legal Blog, Ziran Zhang analyzes the oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
United States would be difficult for everyone, Justices and lawyers alike, became clear just seconds after the hearing opened. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 3:03 am by Bill Araiza
 But if so, then this provision would work a massive change in the role of the courts in our administrative law system -- an "avulsive change," to use Justice Scalia's disparaging language from United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Instead, securities law serves as a backdrop for debates over statutory interpretation, the use of legislative history, and the relationship of the judiciary to the administrative state. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]