Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 4281 - 4300 of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Jurisdiction also is available where conduct occurred outside the United States but which had a foreseeable substantial effect within the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeSentences in $100 Million Fraud Scheme Rejected; Errors, Misinterpretation of §3553(c) Factors Noted United States, appellant v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:11 am by Autumn Brewington
Charges against Gates were quickly dismissed after he agreed in February to cooperate with the prosecution and pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and conspiracy to defraud the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Banco Para el Comercio Exterior de Cuba or standard rules of agency, and whether a tort claim for personal injuries suffered in connection with travel outside of the United States is “based upon” the act occurring outside of the United States or the sale of the ticket in the United States for travel outside of the country. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:19 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
The United States Supreme Court then provided what appears to be bright line guidance on this issue in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Louis M. Solomon
§1350, ALLOWS COURTS TO RECOGNIZE A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF NATIONS OCCURRING WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF A SOVEREIGN OTHER THAN THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by Ronald Mann
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm by Lauren Abbott
HSBC Bank, USA, et al. in the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in support of the consumer-appellant, arguing that courts have not correctly interpreted the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) regarding how long a consumer has to rescind a mortgage loan. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]