Search for: "State v. Law" Results 4281 - 4300 of 155,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am by Stephen Wermiel
These have ranged from a challenge to a controversial state immigration law, in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm by Unknown
Department of the Interior (Trust Relationship)State of California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:36 am by Steve Lubet
Today is the first Monday in October, and the first case up on the SCOTUS docket is Kahler v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
In many Maryland drinking and driving cases, the decision in Rowe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
"4(v)(i) (i) While proper law for arbitration agreement (Curial Law) is indisputably Singaporean Law, what is the proper law for the contract qua the said contract dated 10.9.2003? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (Dram Shop Law) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html In re H.B. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:36 am
National Geographic Society I, 244 F.3d 1267, on the basis of intervening law in the Supreme Court Tasini decision, 533 U.S. 233. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:11 pm
State was the first case in which a court used the Second Amendment to invalidate a gun control law. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
In recent years, 45 states have reformed their laws, adopting comparative negligence standards. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Supp. 700, 702 (ED Pa. 1957) (“Statutes of Journey’s Account originated in England and have long existed, in varying forms, among the states”).Limitations periods for state law claims fall well within the peculiar province of state sovereign authority. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:46 am by Zachary C. Jackson
The Court of Appeals reasoned that, while HIPAA asserts supremacy over state law, it allows for the application of state law regarding physician-patient privilege if the state law is more protective of patients’ privacy rights. [read post]