Search for: "State v. Light" Results 4281 - 4300 of 26,404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm by Florian Mueller
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:09 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Gooch, No. 10-0251/AF, at Hoffstra University School of Law are: WHETHER THE PROCESS FOR SELECTING PANEL MEMBERS FOR APPELLANT’S GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL WAS IMPROPER IN LIGHT OF ARTICLE 25, UCMJ, AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm by Viking
The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issue in light of United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:35 pm by WIMS
Further, such a reading does not thwart Congress's intent, which recognized that some aggregate actions are inherently local in nature and better suited to adjudication by a State court. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court assesses the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and considers only the evidence that supports the verdict. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Photo credit: Kim CarpenterCase of the Day: CFTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Expedia * Men’s Journal Beats Lawsuit Alleging Violation of California’s “Shine the Light” Privacy Statute — Boorstein v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 5:27 pm
The issue in Good was whether cigarette companies could be sued under state law for deceptive advertising of "light cigarettes". [read post]