Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 4281 - 4300 of 36,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
From Chicago to Santiago: The Formation and Impact of the ‘Chicago Boys and Girls’Robert Van Horn, "Corporate Funders, Edward Levi, and the Rise of Chicago Law and Economics in the 1950s"Paul V. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
Lindke argued that Freed maintained the page as part of his “job duties/powers as City Manager” because he used it to regularly communicate with constituents. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
” (para 54) Summary The Supreme Court has dispensed with the unreasoned distinction for the situs of debts under letters of credit created by Power Curber International Ltd v National Bank of Kuwait SAK [1981] 1 WLR 1233 and issued third party debt orders notwithstanding the collateral contractual right of the CBI under the l/cs that payment would be made in a certain way. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:11 pm by NCC Staff
In a brief per-curium, or unsigned, order, the Court dismissed United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 5:44 pm
Elizabeth Rose Schiltz's paper Damming Watters: Channeling the Power of Federal Preemption of State Consumer Banking Laws, 35 Florida State University Law Review, is available at  [ssrn.com]. [read post]
5 May 2025, 12:33 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
  State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlPhillip v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Bloomberg Law article reports that following the SCOTUS’s elimination of Chevron deference, GOP senators are redoubling their efforts to deep six the “Deep State. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
United States (2005) 546 U.S. 12, 17–18; see also Bowles v. [read post]
  The family home was found to be in a state ‘unfit for habitation by children’ and the police exercised their powers of protection under the Children Act 1989, s 46 and removed all eight children from the parents’ care. [read post]