Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 4281 - 4300 of 20,857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am by Nassiri Law
For example, sales workers can be exempt if their payment is based on actual sales as opposed to referrals or wholesale buys. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Sales notes the case was concerned legislative power, which is not at issue here. 15:11: Lord Keen QC argues that the courts are not equipped to decide what is a “legitimate” or “illegitimate” political consideration. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am by Liz Dunshee
Both Conferences will be available for CLE credit in all states except for a few – but hours for each state vary; see this “List: CLE Credit By State. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Ben
 In their complaint, the major labels allege RCN Telecom has been aware for years of rampant copyright infringement by its subscribers, thousands of whom they assert include repeat offenders (UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
XYPN said that historically broker-dealers were considered "intermediaries" rather than fiduciaries, while the states’ complaint explained that broker-dealers make "arms-length sales recommendations. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
Yesterday the New York State Department of Financial Services issued Circular Letter No. 11 (2019) RE: New York State Child Victims Act and Related Insurance. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
It ruled that Article 97(5) of 2009 EU Trade Mark Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a European Union trade mark may bring an infringement action against an infringer before a European Union trade mark court of the Member State within which the consumers or traders to whom that advertising and those offers for sale are directed are located, notwithstanding that that third party took decisions and steps in another Member State to bring about… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Supreme Court granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]