Search for: "State v. So " Results 4281 - 4300 of 117,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am by Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh
In so finding, the Supreme Court rejected the application to the 1972 Order of the “Carltona principle”, so named after the Court of Appeal judgment in Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:59 pm by Mark Murakami
Given the circumstances, we do believe that the regulatory scheme at issue here pushes a state’s legal authority to its very limits, although the state had clear justifications for doing so. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
United States–the removal case–but that case is not cited anywhere in the government’s brief. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Diana A. Silva
Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit issued a unanimous precedential opinion in Bell v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 8:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Actually, the petition is captioned Upstate Citizens for Equality v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm
Koslowski, in so doing distinguishing that ruling from the Second District’s prior ruling in Kuttas v. [read post]