Search for: "State v. Sotomayor" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Alex Wohl
Specifically, for “intentional or willful” violations, the United States is liable for “actual damages. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Ilya Somin
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
To be sure, during the oral argument, Justice Breyer may have undermined the effectiveness of his hypo by appearing to agree with Michael Carvin (for the NFIB) that the argument for federal power in the inoculation case is of a piece with the argument for federal power in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am by Nathan Cortez
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  The states are, after all, asking the Court to ‘fashion’ doctrine for them. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:35 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Forbes.com on March 27, 2012 released the following: “Kashmir Hill, Forbes Staff After the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by Ilyse Schuman
” Justice Sotomayor wondered how the state parties in this lawsuit have standing to content the individual mandate matter. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]