Search for: "State v. Townes" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Butler are both associated with the law firm of Spiros Law, P.C. in Kankakee, Ill.Peyton Heathcoat, et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:36 am by admin
Many websites have privacy policies that state they are not directed to children under age 13 (i.e., general audience websites). [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
West End BoulevardQuakertown, PA 18951 07-2-07 Nasshorn, Donald 215-968-1657 Fax; 215-968-5886 28 North State StreetNewtown, PA 18940 07-2-08 Gaffney, Robert E. 215-230-7265 Fax: 215-230-7276 962 Town CenterNew Britain, PA 18901 07-3-01 Snow, Maggie 215-345-7516 Fax: 215-345-7527 4001 Durham Road (Rt 413) Doylestown, PA 18902 07-3-02 Schnell, Jr., Robert A. 215-343-0627Fax: 215-343-0629 1720 Kendarbren Drive, Suite 711Jamison,… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Church of the Good Shepherd, Town and Country, Missouri (MO) (plaintiffs were Bishop Wayne Smith of the Diocese of Missouri and ECUSA [joined as a necessary party, due to its claimed interest under the Dennis Canon]; trial cou [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
In September 2021, as many Haitian migrants crossed into the Texas town of Del Rio, Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick claimed that Democrats were permitting migrants at the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
The answer, in a word, is federalism, and the New Haven story is an interesting although unintended consequence of the 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
In that case, the town in question had adopted an ordinance that banned picketing targeted at a residence, and the Supreme Court upheld the ordinance as a narrowly tailored "time, place, or manner" restriction on speech. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]