Search for: "Styles v. State" Results 4281 - 4300 of 5,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
“My mantra is, ‘If you care, you prepare,'” he said.Heiskell and Sturns also shared with Varghese Summersett their most memorable moments, leadership styles, and what they think of the current judiciary and district attorney’s office. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am by SHG
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 6:06 am by Naomi Shatz
In one of the leading cases on this topic, Jespersen v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Court subsequently looked to the 2008 Honda v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
A confidential July report to the board found that Dollase’s allegations were partly motivated by his dislike of O’Gara’s management style and personality, and that Dollase was generally not well-liked as a leader, whose management style created office tension. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
This legislation seems premature to me - a half-cocked, git-tuff response to a lingering social conflict between church and state. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm by Law Lady
Moreover, the absent lot owners' interests were sufficiently aligned with those of the existing parties that the existing parties could represent them, and there was no risk of inconsistent judgments.Connecticut State Dental Ass'n v. [read post]