Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
In Brown v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 8:41 am
The court said that the placement of ads within headings and the headings themselves weren't protectable. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
Yeager v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:07 am
This has all the makings of a classic David versus Goliath story where the public perception will end up being that The North Face is just a giant greedy corporation that can't take a joke and wants to beat up on a little guy. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:36 pm
See, e.g., Gertz v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
We mentioned that on December 7, 2009, Judge Gertner of the District Court of Massachusetts issued a decision in Sony BMG Music v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(TorrentFreak) Tuning into the consumer of digital music (IP Osgoode) World’s Fair Use Day – 11 & 12 January 2010 (Public Knowledge) Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names ICANN Board favours expression of interest process for new gTLDs (Managing IP) gTLD TM protection policies take shape (Managing IP) Hotel chain fails in effort to use trademark to block Workers’ Union website in case before WIPO (IP Watch) Argentina Restoration of French… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:49 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:27 pm
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act is one possible avenue for plaintiffs, and courts are not always deferential to broadly (and poorly) worded opt-ins. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
The legislation would require companies that sell products like mortgage-backed securities to keep some "skin in the game" by retaining at least five percent of the credit risk so that, if the investment doesn't pan out, the company that made, packaged and sold the investment would lose out right along with the people they sold it to. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
Melissa] Bean, the OCC could preempt a state consumer protection law by simply writing a letter or issuing a ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
We won’t repeat that start-up mistake either, because our legislation is written differently to protect electricity customers and to make sure that they, not the power companies, will get the financial value of the pollution allowances through energy efficiency programs and lower bills. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 504 F.3d 718 (9th Cir. 2007); Overstock.com v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
See AstraZeneca LP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
t prove up to the task. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
