Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Banks" Results 4281 - 4300 of 4,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 10:05 pm by Sean Hayes
_____SeanHayes@ipglegal.comSimilar Posts: Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
The verdict was eagerly anticipated, not just by lawyers and court watchers, but also by activists and a broad cross-section of ordinary people. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), which held that the unnecessary institutional segregation of disabled people constitutes discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities ActUNSEALED SUIT TOSSED IN FALSE CLAIMS ACT CASE, United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Belt Do not break the bank on a $100 belt. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
  The FDIC acts in their  receivership capacity when they "resolve" a failed bank as the bank's receiver. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
" Some people think that the Court punishes the executive for failing to deliver a healthy economy by ruling against it in recessions. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am by Andrei Mincov
Recently I wrote a 100-page comparative research paper on the treatment of parody in the copyright laws of common law countries and selected European countries. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:28 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Two Years After Guilty Plea, Defendant Denied Withdrawal After Failing Treatment Mandate People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:30 am
“Such tragedies can be avoided or reduced if governments adopt disaster risk reduction strategies aimed at protecting people’s health. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
The Fed controls the "monetary base," which is the sum of currency and the (mostly electronic) money that banks have on reserve. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:16 am
Emigrant Bank; Pinero v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]