Search for: "Tri-State Bit "
Results 4281 - 4300
of 4,373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
The Federal Circuit has reinterpreted 103 as providing, not a "condition for patentability" (as its statutory title states, and as this Court has construed 103 as providing), but as a condition for challenges to patentability that is very difficult for the PTO or an alleged infringer to meet, and effectively forces the issuance and upholding of patents even where, as in this case, claimed subject matter differs from undisputed prior art in only trivial respects. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:02 am
Pillars] consumed one plug of his purchase, which measured up to representations, that it was tobacco unmixed with human flesh, but when appellant tackled the second plug it made him sick, but, not suspecting the tobacco, he tried another chew, and still another, until he bit into some foreign substance, which crumbled like dry bread, and caused him to foam at the mouth, while he was getting "sicker and sicker. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:53 pm
We root around for cases that look interesting, think about their implications, do a little bit of research, and try to say something worth saying. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:43 am
A little bit of friction today is worth a lot of leverage in six months. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
It usually takes a bit of explaining for them to fully understand this rather odd bit of our Canadian trade-mark law. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:43 pm
Prosecutors said any discrepancies in their stories might have been a result of the trauma the teens went through.Ann Bartow at Feminist Law Professors is a bit surprised by the verdict: "I wasn't in 'the dungeon,' nor in the courtroom while the case was tried, but based on media accounts of what happened, this verdict seems preposterous. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 4:11 pm
He optimistically and with great precision tries to clarify the discussion in a lawyerly way. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
The National Conference of State Legislatures has prepared a page about the effects of the Act on states. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:15 am
" I ask Arnie to talk about this a bit more; culture, I've always believed, is perhaps the #1 ineffable whose impact you can actually observe every day. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:25 am
Perry vetoed in 2005, with a couple of tweaks to accomodate the Guv's stated concerns. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 7:55 am
.], you'll realize that stating your problem strengthens your hand. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
Instead, he tried to reopen under INS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:09 pm
The First goes a bit out on a limb and concludes that there was evidence of her mental state because "the government's evidence was insufficient to show that the defendant possessed a firearm within 1000 feet of a school's grounds. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:08 pm
Possibly the best bit of irrelevance I stumbled upon was Sanders v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
She's also probably the brightest: would that she chose to play that up a bit more! [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:50 am
Attorney's wife was made a state Supreme Court justice. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:36 am
When I bring up the issue, the former Baptist minister becomes defensive and tries to place the blame elsewhere. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:36 pm
Could looters have been tried by military tribunals? [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:35 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
