Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 4,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
United States,540 U.S. 375, 381, 124 S. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
Sec. 154 states that a patent grant shall be for a term beginning on the date on which the patent issues and ending 20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains certain specific references to an earlier filed application or applications, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:32 pm
The solution is to create a one-off exception to the exclusionary rule for terrorists who attacked the United States in the past, a one-off return to the rule which prevailed prior to Mapp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:49 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:21 am
Rather, a hard drive is comprised of many platters, or magnetic data storage units, mounted together. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
After its February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
That was for the specific reason that one of the important Indian cases on the point - State of UP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
Lujan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
United Yarn Tex. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:21 pm
In Communication Workers of America v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
One of these items is United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
Instead, the defendant argued, the statute required the defendant to somehow alter the product in some way. [read post]
