Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 4281 - 4300
of 7,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 549 (1992), holds that entrapment must be decided by the factfinder under the usual "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and therefore, arguably not in a pre-trial motion. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Fisher then petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and the petition remains on the Court’s current docket. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:13 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
If not, and in the case of the asserted claims of race discrimination the minority thought not, the minority suggested that a judge ought to determine the arbitrability of a matter, rather than the arbitrator essentially deciding his/her own fate. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:38 am
Unit B 1982). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:57 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, which made it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
In Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Bell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
They never adopted the children in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]