Search for: "United States v. State of Washington" Results 4281 - 4300 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2018, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Biegalski (Doctrine of Claim Preclusion; State Taxation; Utilities)Guardado v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
United States, the justices will decide if Idaho’s Defense of Life Act is “pre-empted,” or blocked, because it conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In Federalist No. 2, John Jay, writing of course as Publius, asserted that the Constitution had to be ratified, or else the unity of the United States, such as it was, would be lost. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Stitt and the State of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Thomas Merrill
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:19 am by Corbin K. Barthold and Cory L. Andrews
Barthold are, respectively, Senior Litigation Counsel and Litigation Counsel at the Washington Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of the challenger in Kisor v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In this circumstance, it is not surprising that leading Democratic politicians, progressive legal scholars, and centrist or center-left groups like Common Cause have portrayed a new convention called under Article V of the 1787 Constitution as an anathema that would destroy what is left of the federal system sustaining the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm by Eric Muller
United States (1944): "I dissent ... from this legalization of racism. [read post]