Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 6,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2011, 4:50 pm
There are also trial transcripts in this post, which could be very useful, particularly if you have notice that the expert in question is testifying for your opponent.Thanks to Orin Kerr at VC for the pointer. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:27 pm
(Orin Kerr) The site is here, and it offers a “daily digest of brief case summaries of legal opinions that discuss behavioral sciences evidence” in both criminal and civil cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm
(Orin Kerr) A Supreme Court Justice once published a law review article called Space Colonization and the Law that had the following in the first paragraph:[Y]ou may think that what I say is pure fantasy and that I’ve taken leave of my senses. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
Orin Kerr took up this fight over at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at CoOp, Dave Hoffman points to a new paper, “They Saw a Protest”: Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction, by the folks at Yale’s Cultural Cognition Project — Dan Kahan, Dave, my colleague Don Braman, Danieli Evans, and Jeffrey Rachlinski. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 pm
As Orin Kerr has brilliantly pointed out, “people who disagree with me are just arguing in bad faith. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:47 pm
Orin Kerr: Recent VC comment threads suggest that some commenters at the VC admire lower courts judges who are less concerned with following Supreme Court precedent than getting the law right as they see it. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 10:47 am
(Orin Kerr) Recent VC comment threads suggest that some commenters at the VC admire lower courts judges who are less concerned with following Supreme Court precedent than getting the law right as they see it. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) I was reading some cases on Westlaw recently when I noticed a relatively new description in the West summary: “Affirmed but criticized. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
(Orin Kerr) Here’s the introduction of today’s decision of the 6th Circuit in Freeland v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) In the last year, readers of this blog have seen lots of posts on a major constitutional issue that is likely to reach the Supreme Court soon. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:14 pm
Ocean Gate Municipal Court (Ocean County, New Jersey) Address: Ocean Gate Municipal Court 151 East Longport Avenue Ocean Gate, NJ 08740 Phone: (732) 269-3166 Fax: (732) 269-6652 Police: (732) 269-3166, Ext. 24 The judge in Ocean Gate Court is Stacey Kerr, Esq. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:49 pm
This upcoming Supreme Court case asks whether there is a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule when a search is authorized by precedent at the time of the search but that precedent is later overruled.CJLF disagrees with Professor Kerr in this case, and our brief supporting the government is due Feb. 18. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:18 am
(Orin Kerr) In the new Journal of Legal Education, Sara Ludington has a very interesting article, The Dogs that Did Not Bark: Academic Freedom, Tenure, and the Silence of the Legal Academy During World War II. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:42 am
(Eugene Volokh) The National Law Journal’s Appellate Lawyer of the Week is none other than our own Orin Kerr, who’ll be arguing before the Supreme Court next month. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
Discussing Judge Vinson's ruling on the health bill, Orin Kerr writes: If you are an originalist, [. . . i]f you? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
The child’s ‘best interests’ may indeed be, in Lord Kerr’s words, “a universal theme of various international and domestic instruments” but theme is all it is; it essentially lacks content. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:59 pm
Breve y absolutamente correcta conjetura de Orin Kerr sobre por qué los blogs de facultades casi nunca funcionan [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
In the words of Professor Orin Kerr, “[o]nce you’re out of school for a bit, people care whether you are a good attorney, not your law school GPA. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
(Orin Kerr) My earlier post on Judge Vinson’s opinion seems to have caused a lot of confusion, so I thought I would try again to express my concerns with Judge Vinson’s opinion a bit more clearly.The core problem, I think, is that Supreme Court doctrine has strayed far from the original meaning of the scope of federal power granted by the Constitution. [read post]
