Search for: "A J Smith"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 5,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
Smith, 230 F.3d 300, 305 (7th Cir. 2000). [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:57 pm
There’s a fabulous transcript (PDF) of the late-night hearing, with Smith J expressing some serious scepticism about the whole enterprise and the realistic impact of the spoof on Associated’s interests. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Simmons, Michael Sink, John Skenyon, Ronald Smith, Eric Sophir, Robert Stanley, Henry Su, Blair Taylor, Bryan Vogel, Keith Vogt, Daniel Volchok, Steven Warner, Scott C. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
Smith and Fritz Weinschenk. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
., concurring) (Daughtrey, J. concurring in part and dissenting in part) (Anderson, J. concurring and dissenting). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Many great judicial legacies have a deep theoretical foundation—Oliver Wendell Holmes’s skeptical pragmatism, William J. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:03 am
This is a postscript to Adam Wagner’s post this morning on the UKSC decision in R (Smith) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Smith and Fritz Weinschenk, In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and ReversalGrosz v MoMA Amicus Brief - Nazi Art Looting Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Smith, Jr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
We now have the answer to this question in the form of KCI Licensing v Smith and Nephew Inc, a judgment recently handed down by Arnold J (here, noted by the IPKat here).In this case a US provisional application was filed in the name of the inventor, with KCI being the successor in title. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:09 am
Smith and Dr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith &… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith & … [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis case, the second to… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:59 pm
As Smith J. noted in O’Rourke v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:45 pm
Metro, Robert J. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
New additions have two red stars next to the name.Albany: Megan Fairlie (Florida International) (2010-11)Brooklyn: Donna Coker (Miami) (Fall 2010)Case Western Reserve: Tawia Ansah (New England School of Law) (Fall 2010)Charleston: Angela Laughlin (Texas Tech) (2010-11)Columbia: Akhil Amar (Yale) (Fall 2010); Jody Kraus (Virginia) (2010-11); Daniel Rodriguez (Texas) (Spring 2011); Olivier de Schutter (Université de Louvain Collège) (Fall… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am
In commentary for the Baltimore Sun, attorney J. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
It was basically accepted that, for the purposes of the proceedings, the skilled addressee was a team consisting of a medical devices engineer and a clinician.Mann J held the patent valid but decidedly uninfringed. [read post]
