Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 4301 - 4320 of 11,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
  Just look at the FDA’s “reference 5” − Defendant’s [FDA’s] Memorandum of Points & Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss or Summary Judgment, Allergan Inc., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
” The Court then went on to consider an alternative basis for striking out, namely abuse of the process of the Court The Jameel principle (deriving from Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75) is used frequently in the United Kingdom  to strike out libel actions as an abuse of process and has been raised in one reported Ontario case (Goldhar v Haaretz.com et al., 2015 ONSC 1128) without success However libel actions have been struck… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
That year, she also successfully defended against a claim of trademark infringement for her client, PGD, Inc., involving the name of a generic drug in the case Doral Pharmamedics v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:43 am by Joe Koncelik
Ultra Resources, Inc., (No. 4:11-CV-1360 Feb. 23, 2015), an environmental group challenged the State's (Pennsylvania DEP) issuance of eight separate air permits to oil & gas compressor stations. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: The Adoption by International Tribunals of a Substantive/Transactional Approach to Res Judicata—A New Paradigm in International Dispute Resolution? [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am by Thomas D. Nevins
The members of the putative class purchased guitars and amplifiers from defendant Guitar Center, Inc., the largest retailer of musical instruments in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
  Unfortunately, the good guys lost the broader express preemption arguments almost twenty years ago in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]