Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 34,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 5:06 am
Holmgren v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:18 am
However, JetBlue was awarded summary judgment on the state-law claim concerning itemized wage statements because the attendants were not based in California, were not paid in California, and did not spend enough time in the state for that law to apply (Booher v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:57 pm
A federal trial judge in California has handed down an opinion, Jones v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
Cohen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:11 pm
Crow (Habeas Corpus Relief)United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm
The new law clarifies that an offer or sale of a franchise is made in California when the franchise business is intended to be operated in California. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:50 am
Additional Resources: McKennon v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Under the 1996 case of People v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:57 pm
Soon after the California Supreme Court published its landmark decision of Dynamex Operations W. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
Rosenburg's email):Last week, the California Supreme Court held in Cable Connection, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:25 am
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday heard oral arguments in A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Clinic v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 8:01 am
California law provides double damages for harm caused to timber, trees, and underwood. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:46 am
The California Endowment in Los Angeles is hosting a mock moot court tomorrow in Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:00 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
Monty v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
Appellant has pointed to no clear factual error or mistake of law in the district court's analysis of the public interest factors. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
The California Court of Appeal considered and declined to follow the NLRB's decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Defendant moved for summary judgment on the grounds that its tip pooling policy did not violate California law, relying in part on Leighton v. [read post]
