Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 16,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
This is very similar to the approach adopted by the High Court of this Jurisdiction in NT1 v Google and in Ireland in Townsend v Google under the pre-GDPR data protection legislation. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:07 am
In the recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision of Mathurin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:30 am
This post is cross-posted on Just Security. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:51 am
In Reinig v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Paul and Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:09 pm
Another example is found in this unpublished opinion from the 11th Circuit, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
The answers to these questions will have important implications for employers whose employees regularly cross state lines in and out of California to perform work. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
In September 2018, Rasheedul Mowla, a 22-year-old from Brooklyn was indicted for attempting and conspiring to provide material support to the Islamic State after being detained in a Middle Eastern country in June 2017 for trying to cross the border into Syria. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:22 am
” In Green v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:19 am
Facts: This case (Patel v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:11 am
Amadore v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm
In commenting on the trial court’s dismissal of the VCDL v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:23 am
Facts: This case (Rogers v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
American Humanist Association, an establishment clause challenge to a World War I memorial shaped like a cross on public property. [read post]
